FirstLiberties.com banner

 

 

 

Issues

Resources

Links

Front Page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

The Hezbollah Version of History
August 14, 2006

By James L. Hirsen, J.D., Ph.D.
contributor to Newsmax.com

President Bush recently demonstrated that the choice of words can set the tone and mood of the nation.

It was the first time that in describing the nation's fight against terrorism the president modified his prior rhetoric and clearly stated that what we are engaged in is a "war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those who love freedom [and] to hurt our nation."

Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum has been ahead of the curve when it comes to the vocabulary of war. In a July 2006 speech at the National Press Club, Santorum examined President Bush's penchant for use of the phrase "war on terror." (At an event I personally attended, the senator elaborated on the same theme.)

"Some say we're fighting a war on terror," Santorum said. "That's like saying World War II was a war on blitzkrieg. Terror, like blitzkrieg, is a tactic of war used by our enemy; it is not the enemy. ... In World War II, we fought Nazism and Japanese imperialism. Today we are fighting against Islamic fascism."

Bush's use of the more specific terminology brought an immediate denunciation from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

In a letter to the president, Parvez Ahmed, CAIR board chairman, wrote, "The use of ill-defined hot-button terms such as ‘Islamic fascists,' ‘militant jihadism,' ‘Islamic radicalism' or ‘totalitarian Islamic empire' harms our nation's image and interests worldwide, particularly in the Islamic world."

It seems that when the news and/or entertainment media attempt to report on, or include within a product's content, the suggestion that a relationship between Muslims and terrorism exists, CAIR typically goes on offense and pressures the individual or company in question to make the proper adjustments. This causes the news and entertainment media to change messages, approaches or presentations, and a distorted reality is what is ultimately presented to the public.

Mike Wallace recently interviewed the president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The 88-year-old correspondent called the Hezbollah-backer "an impressive fellow," "obviously smart as hell," "reasonable" and "an interesting man."

Meanwhile, ABC used a recent segment of "World News with Charles Gibson" to showcase Richard Clarke, the former counterterrorism chief in the Clinton and current administrations, an ardent Bush critic and now an ABC News consultant. In his appearance, Clarke used al-Qaida and Nazi in the same breath, but in so doing did not receive the same linguistic chastisement as Bush and others have. Clarke also implied that the Bush administration has not been aggressive enough in its war strategy.

Clarke responded to a question about the use of the term "Islamic fascists" by pointing out that Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan were beaten in less than four years "but five years into this war against al-Qaida, they're out there still plotting major attacks against the United States."

Life is good for critics of the war. Besides being a consultant for a major television network, Clarke's 2004 book, "Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror," is being made into a motion picture, which will reportedly star actor, peace activist and avocational journalist Sean Penn.

The moral of the media story? Truth in nomenclature poses no present-day obstacle for those who tell a Hezbollah version of history.

Reproduced with the permission of
NewsMax.com . All rights reserved


We appreciate your Comments.
Copyright © 2006
James L. Hirsen, J.D., Ph.D.
All Copyrightable Rights Reserved